Philosophy on Map Files

Discussions about design and architecture principles, including native JADE systems and JADE interoperating with other technologies
ConvertFromOldNGs
Posts: 5321
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:19 pm

Re: Philosophy on Map Files

Postby ConvertFromOldNGs » Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:25 am

by Torrie Moore >> Tue, 26 Jun 2001 6:23:07 GMT

Hi John

There may be a performance advantage by putting collections in a different map file (or parent object with exclusive collections). In a large system the map files can be put on separate disks increasing the performance and head movement is not an issue.

Torrie Moore

ConvertFromOldNGs
Posts: 5321
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:19 pm

Re: Philosophy on Map Files

Postby ConvertFromOldNGs » Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:25 am

by John Porter >> Fri, 28 Sep 2001 4:51:34 GMT

In a large system, raid disk would normally be used, which automatically provides the benefit of spreading across multiple physical disks without having to design that into your mappings. In that case there is benefit to keeping the collections with either the parent or child objects (as Craig points out, with exclusive collections they can only be with their parent).

Assigning to different drive letters in a raid situation may actually slow it down, as multiple drives are frequently configured onto different areas of the same physical drives (similar to multiple partitions on your desktop's hard drive), guaranteeing more head movement.

Cheers,
John P

ConvertFromOldNGs
Posts: 5321
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:19 pm

Re: Philosophy on Map Files

Postby ConvertFromOldNGs » Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:25 am

by Craig Shearer >> Fri, 22 Jun 2001 1:43:46 GMT

I would have thought that somebody from the plant would have commented on this... where are you all?

Craig.


Return to “Design and Architecture”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron